http://www.geekent.com/BNY/chameleon.css

September 4, 2008

Getting fit and other things:

Aden and I are on a new regimen... well, sorta. We'll see how long it lasts anyway. We've started playing tennis on two of the three days when the little guy isn't with us, and this week we've started doing length swims during lunch at the local pool (I'm way out of shape, or at least my lungs are, and I can only do about 15 minutes before I start getting a little dizzy). We also rode into work yesterday for the first time in a couple months, which is a positive step, except now we have to ride it home at some point, if only we could just ride in (the ride in is easy, mostly down hill, about 1/2 hour... the ride home is tough, mostly uphill and about 1 hour, and it causes me lung inflammations).

Our regimen is loose but we're looking at:
Sunday/Tuesday - Tennis
Monday/Thursday - Swimming
Tuesday - Ride In (transit home late)
Wednesday - Ride In
Friday - Ride Home
Call it half-assed cross-training

I <3 Google


Well, I suckered myself back into another 3-year term with Rogers, so I won't likely be able to do the whole Google Android thing for a while (but I'm much more interested in it than the iPhone). I like my new phone... a Samsung (whatever), which means I have a working phone again so people can get in touch with the 401 Kent once more should they need to.

But what's got me enthused is Chrome, the new Google browser. Although I'm really not geeky enough to care too much about one browser or another (I do prefer firefox to MS Exploder though), I'm thrilled that Google hired Understanding Comics guru Scott McCloud to illustrate an on-line Comic Book to explain away what it is that makes Chrome so awesome. And it's awesome. I love comics.

Writtens


I'm now contributing regularly to Second Printing, so if you like reading about comics, that's where I get my geek on. If you like reading reviews of comics, I'm dishing out my opinion weekly on Rack Raids (usually Thursdays)

|


August 30, 2008

Acquisitions: August

Oh August, bless you for your treasure trove of comedy and comics. My first official month out of debt and I could have went crazy with the spending, and I did, compared to the last 8 months at least, but I kept it fairly in check and the bulk of what was viewed or acquired was not out of my pocket. Getting paid-in-trade from my LCS for working the Toronto Fan Expo was pretty sweet, and if I meter my acquisitions over the next four months I should be able to make it through this entire year without having paid for a single comic book out of pocked (well, except for the one or two breakdowns at BMV books). Working the Fan Expo also afforded me the opportunity to do some immediate trade with the LCS, as on the Friday I recognized that a lot of people were asking for things we didn't have and that I had at home, so I brought them in on Saturday and got some immediate trade, which allowed Aden and myself to pick up some things without even yet dipping into our work-for-trade.

The LCS also had about 60 $0.25 bins filled with comics dating as far back as 1981 through to 1998. I noticed a lot of Legion of Super-Heroes and other curiosities that I've been pondering, and as I dug through my stack just started to grow and grow and grow. I had to stop myself (just before I got to the 40-issue run of Captain Atom) and I wound up with 180 comic books which even at 5/$1 is only $36(!). Of course, for all my hard work, they just let me walk home with them (better than them having to carry them back to the store). Wow... I probably don't need to acquire ANY more comics for the rest of the year. I still will, just, it's going to affect how much I bring home every week, knowing that I have so much to read. Of course, the books I got are runs with some gaps in them, so I'm going to have to dig around to fill in some of them (maybe there's more $0.25 bins to come?).

Finally, Aden, the little guy and I went to the Canadian National Exhibition, a loud and trashy place (where I saw a pregnant woman smoking...nice) which was an interesting experience and none that I need to repeat for a few more years. While there we wandered into one of the convention halls where there was a sales bonanza going on, including one area that was selling DVDs at 5/$20. I wanted to look, but, also knowing I'd be tempted, wanted to walk away. Aden tempted me in saying she'd pay for anything (and at $4 a pop it's cheaper buying the videos than renting). And thus we walked out with 10 +1 DVDs, some favourites (How To Get Ahead In Advertising, A Mighty Wind), some we've been meaning to rent (Munich, United '93), and two TV on DVD that satiate the Python fanatic in me (oh, and Mr. T in DC Cab, weee).

Anyway... a consumptive month after the cut.

Continue reading "Acquisitions: August" »


|


August 27, 2008

[Review] Man on Wire

Viewed: In theatre
Release Date: August 1, 2008
director: James Marsh


PhilippeSm.jpg

In some respects Man on Wire is a caper film, like The Great Train Robbery, The Italian Job, or Oceans 11: you know they're going to succeed, so it's not the "if" but the "how" that suckers you in. The fact that this film is a documentary, being retold by the participants, mixing photos and reenacted (and treated to look era-"authentic") scenes beneath the voice-overs gives it an interesting edge which both helps and hinders it.

On August 7th, 1974, after years of dreaming and planning, French wire-walker, Philippe Petit strutted out onto a wire secured between the rooftops of the twin towers of the World Trade Centre. Hundreds of feet above the ground, barely visible from the ground, Petit performed for over 40 minutes, and became a celeb-du-jour. The film features a highly animated, excitable, aged Petit recounting the adventures that led him to walk the cable and stare death in the face. As well, his accomplices, including his best friend Jean-Louis Blondeau, his girlfriend Annie Allix, "the Australian", the Americans and others who helped him each revisit their adventures, some with near-equal fervor as Petit, others wistfully, and still others with regret.

Continue reading "[Review] Man on Wire" »


|


August 26, 2008

How much does one person have to say

I've been quiet for a few days, but with one very good reason... I'm exhausted. I was working the Toronto Fan Expo, helping out my local comics shoppe (LCS), The Silver Snail. I started Thursday evening, helping with set-up for four hours, then continuing again Friday morning at 7am until the show opened at 2pm. Then I helped take monies from fanboys (and girls) until 9pm (yes a 14 hour day standing on concrete deep in the bowels of the Metro Toronto Convention center where nary a drop of natural light dare enter), and returned Saturday at 9am to do the same for another 10 hours, and once again on Sunday from 10am - 6pm, followed by 4 hours of takedown. All in all over forty gruelling hours of feet-expanding torture. But when I get my phat store credit, it'll all be worth it.

Also, this past Saturday was my first wedding anniversary, and I did indeed spend the full day with my wife, who also worked the convention (in fact, it's through her that I got in there, and I'm now part of "the gang", which makes me happy). We had dinner afterwards, but no gifts were exchanged... rather, we exchanged some comics for merchandise and Aden got a beefy 12" Nightwing (that, I'm sure, sounds really dirty if you don't know what I'm talking about), while I got a pair of lovely ladies for the bookshelf. All around, our first anniversary was just as geeky as our wedding weekend... good to know we're not in any newlywed slump.

The convention gave me a lot of interesting thoughts to ponder about the nature of fandom and the culture of collecting, and now I have a venue to do it. I've been invited to participate in the group blog Second Printing, which is a blog about pondering fandom, so it's a natural match. In fact, my first post went up today. Talking about my nervousness about meeting with comic book creators or other celebritants, it's a bit of a rambling post, and I'll work on reigning things in a little for the future.

This reminds me that I also have had posted my Hoverboy interview (I interview Hoverboy's masterminds Marcus Moore and Ty Templeton) up on CHUD.com. I got to visit the Hoverboy Travelling Museum at Fan Expo this weekend and it was AWESOME! If you haven't already visit the Virtual Hoverboy Museum, because Hoverboy is bloody hilarious. I'm in utter awe of this project and I predict building success for it.

Some new for Frank, if'n he still pops around this site on occasion. Cliff Chiang, comic book illustrator extraordinare is working on a new graphic novel for Vertigo that spins out from Neil Young's Greendale album (which was also a movie, thanks IMDB). Bizarre, but true.

And finally, I leave you with this cover image to an upcoming SLG Publishing book, because it makes me laugh uncontrollably:
ttsuffice.jpg

and there's a FREE PDF PREVIEW over on the website
|


August 21, 2008

[Review] Tropic Thunder

Viewed: In theatre
Release Date: August 13, 2008
writers: Ben Stiller, Justin Theroux, Etan Cohen
director: Ben Stiller

tropic-thunder.jpg

There was a trailer for a film called Disaster Movie which ran immediately prior to the screening of Tropic Thunder, which appears the latest in a long line of scattershot movie parodies (see "Superhero Movie", "Date Movie", "Epic Movie", "Scary Movie 1 - 3" etc). I can't actually say I've seen a single one of those films, and I doubt I ever will. My wife said it best after having the trailer unavoidably projected before us: "That killed some precious brain cells just witnessing it."

The problem with those movies (again, I haven't seen them, but it's obvious from their trailers), is they have no intelligence or thought put into the humour behind them. Every joke is easy to make: 1) have an actor recite a popular line from a recent movie, but in a goofy voice, punctuated by getting hit in the balls; 2) reenact a popular scene from a recent film, only people's pants fall down or get hit in the head while doing it; 3) take a tabloid-fodder celeb du jour (eg. Britney Spears or Miley Cyrus) and flog the dead horse that Leno and Letterman have long since moved on from until there's nothing left but grotesque entrails and pulpy meat. It's not even Mad Magazine level juvenile humour, but something well below that, pandering to the lowest common denominator at every turn. Every film they aim to ape is it's immediate superior, no matter their quality, and in trying to take the piss out of them, they only serve to highlight that fact. They get away with stealing quotes, music, scenes under the guise of "parody", and I guess it is, but it's the lowest form of comedy out there, bereft of any creativity, riding on the coattails of other peoples talents.

Mel Brooks, followed by Jim Abrahams and the Zucker Brothers were the first to really capture the spirit of parody without directly mocking the films they were emulating. Blazing Saddles, Airplane, Naked Gun, Young Frankenstein all take the formula of popular cinema of the times (westerns, disaster movies, hard-boiled cop dramas, horror) but inject actual story and character development in amidst clever wordplay and satirical content, moving well beyond the easy string-of-spoofing-sequences. It's a shame that Brooks and David Zucker would fall prey to the later produce much cheaper and more obvious parody fodder.

Tropic Thunder picks up the parody torch dropped long ago. Although it takes aim at Vietnam Movies (hardly topical anymore), it's just the backdrop for a much larger jab in the ribs of the Hollywood system, as well as developing a well rounded cast of comedic characters featuring actual gifted comedic and acting talent.

Continue reading "[Review] Tropic Thunder" »


|


August 20, 2008

what I won't be buying (comics for November)

And then there were two. August is half over, and after this weekend's Fan Expo conventioneering "volunteering" I'll have a pirate's booty of store credit at the LCS to keep me going until the new year. I've seen what September and October have to offer, and now it's November's turn to try and bilk me of my credits.

As usual, not necessarily what I'm going to buy, but also what I would normally buy and snide comments on things I'd never buy. Come January I'm going to do a side-by-side comparison list of acquisitions vs. want list.

Continue reading "what I won't be buying (comics for November)" »


|


August 19, 2008

Blockbuster Fatigue

An article at Salon.com poses the question: are we suffering from "Blockbuster Fatigue"?

Jim Emerson contemplates.

I respond.

1) Movies aren't sold like they used to be, and aren't seen like they used to be. They're not even made like they used to be. There's an evolution to cinema: the product, the spectator, the physical building... they all change and adapt. There are trends that come, like the current superhero blockbuster fixation (and Indiana Jones is as much a superhero as Hancock and Batman and Hellboy and Hulk), which will last only so long before fatigue sets in and something else replaces it.

2) This is the first summer, though, where blockbuster season has actually given us a plethora of *digestible* films. If you look at most of the big releases each week, Ebert's given them 3-stars or better, and that I think is unprecedented. Now, superheroic feats can be brought to the screen with some semblance of tangible realism (and not just cartoonish CGI effects, but a greater mix of practical within the digital to create something that breathes rather than just looks cool), and with that you can tell stories with some semblance of realism. You can give superheroes to talented writers and directors and let them play in the comic book playground with less studio interference. That comes across on screen, making movies about characters rather than properties, something which the audience is going to engage more with and enjoy, and that even some of the cinematic literati will appreciate (although some of them just can't relax enough to enjoy a good, cathartic explosion). I enjoy small dramas and documentaries etc. often as much if not more than spectacle, but I do so love a good spectacle. With most blockbuster seasons, it's often just as easy to let a film pass by (can you even remember what the big films were last year? Two years ago?), but this year there are, for the spectacle lover, way too many good ones to pass up.

3) in comics each year for the past 22 years the major publishers Marvel and DC roll out a massive "crossover"... wherein all the various characters (Batman, Superman, Green Lantern, Wonder Woman etc) come together for some big to do, which then impacts on all their titles for, say a six month duration. They've taken to calling these "Event Comics" which are essentially the Summer blockbusters of the comic world, and for about two or three years now the term "event fatigue" has been bandied about comic book critics/watchdog land. I find it ironic that "blockbuster fatigue" is being coined in the summer where superheroes play the biggest part. Coincidence?

4) On the cycle of movies (also referring back to my first point), films are only meant to last for a few weeks now. All that basically matters in trumpeting a film-as-success is getting the #1 spot on opening weekend. If it holds for a second week, gravy (and if word-of-mouth carries it further, bonus). I imagine Pineapple Express might be somewhat of a failure since it couldn't dethrone the Dark Knight and then got overshadowed by Tropic Thunder this week. But all hope is not lost, for in 3 months time, the hype machine starts up all over again as the DVDs get released, and these days, it seems like that's where the real money is for the studios/distributors. The fact that posters languish around like an afterthought will play into sales pitch for the film's second release come "new release Tuesday".

5) Speaking of, (and something I've spoken to before) people have bought into cycles, which includes "new release Tuesday" for DVDs and music, new movie Fridays, and new comic book Wednesdays. The system has given us a schedule on when we can expect our new consumer goods and trained us to buy into these cycles. Once you get into the habit, it's hard to break (trust me, I've been trying). Plus, our consumerist nature makes us want more, and we're an easy mark, hence DVDs marketed not for the movie but deleted scenes and special features. "If you liked it in the theatres, you'll love it on DVD". How many films are worth watching twice? How many of us will watch a film twice (never mind commentary tracks and production featurettes)? And how many of us buy a DVD of a movie we've already seen only to have it languish on our shelves in their cellophane, undisturbed? I've got a few of those.

6) And finally, there won't be as many people suffering from blockbuster fatigue as one might think. People who write about movies for a living and the people who read their work are a subset of the masses, and I don't think the masses spend nearly as much time watching trailers or reading articles/reviews on-line as reviewers and cinephiles do. Most people don't care to think so much about movies. We're just special that way.

Addendum:
Just finished off blockbuster season this week with Tropic Thunder and a second viewing of The Dark Knight (triumphantly getting an IMAX viewing). Of the summer spectacles, these two handily top my list as favourites. In fact, I probably like TT more than Iron Man (the DVD for which hits September 30th, in basic and special edition). Now comes the awkward transition of switching gears from blockbuster mode to art-house and dramatic fair.

Actually, looking at the September releases, it looks like "blockbuster season" for people who don't like blockbusters: movies based off best-selling novels (Blindness, Choke); an Americanization of a foreign film (Bangkok Dangerous); films from popular creators (Alan Ball's Towelhead, Spike Lee's Miracle at St. Anna, Coen Bros. Burn After Reading); artsy acting favourites (DeNiro/Pachino in Righteous Kill, Viggo Mortensen and Ed Harris in Appaloosa, Ricky Gervais in Ghost Town ); chick flicks (tedious English period piece the Duchess, Dane Cook and Kate Hudson *shudder* in My Best Friend's Girl, Richard Gere and Diane Lane *double shudder* in Nights in Rodanthe), and escapist thriller fare (Sam Jackson in Lakeview Terrace, Shia LaBeouf in Eagle Eye).

I'm curious to see how Towelhead fares with critics, and Burn After Reading is a must see, while Miracle at St. Anna, Eagle Eye and Choke have me intrigued. Canadian favourite Don McKellar wrote the screenplay and co-stars in Blindness, but it was such a depressing novel that I'm not sure I want to see it acted out.

Continue reading "Blockbuster Fatigue" »


|


August 18, 2008

[tube] <((music))> |screen|

Clint Mansell's soundtrack (with the Kronos Quartet) for the Darren Aronofsky film Requiem For A Dream is a very potent, intense and frightening work, and also quite beautiful at times. It's achieved a cult status which may at this point surpass the film itself, most likely because of the track Lux Aeterna, which has been coopted by more movie trailers that I can recall... but that's why there's wikipedia. You've no doubt heard it, recently even, on the Telus advert currently showing before most films or shortly afterwards in this trailer:


Babylon A.D.

Yes, of course it sounds familiar. Remember the trailer to such small little films like 300, I Am Legend, or Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers?

Of course, reusing music isn't anything new, I think it's just the rather excessive use of Mansell's wonderful composition that surprises me.

Stranger though is the repurposing of the theme from fanboy favourite The Adventures of Brisco County Jr. (written by Randy Edelman) by NBC for their Olympics broadcast (apparently they've been using it for various sporting events as far back as their 1996 MLB All-Star Game coverage).



Continue reading "[tube] <((music))> |screen|" »


|


August 14, 2008

[Re-Review] Magnetic Fields/Wolf Parade/Balanescu Quartet

Albums: Magnetic Fields - Holiday; Wolf Parade - Apologies to the Queen Mary; Balanescu Quartet - Possessed
Dates Purchased - 1994(95?)/2005/2001
Original Review(s) - none

[re-review] The Magnetic Fields - Holiday
holiday.jpgOh... oh my, it's been ages, years and years since I last listened to this album. It's the first Magnetic Fields album I bought and possibly the first indie music purchase I ever made (unconfirmed). It's certainly weathered the years though, and coming out the other end 15 years later it once again brings a smile to my face. Stephin Merritt's utter desire to create pop music was never so misguided than back in 1993 when he was using sequencers and keyboards and toys rather than every instrument under the sun in developing his songs. What results is 13 rapidly-paced, highly infectious, and deviantly bouncy tracks and a curious introduction. What's been evident from my very first listen (on a Brave New Waves spotlight on CBC radio in early 2004) to Stephin Merritt's work - be it the Magnetic Fields, the Sixths, the Gothic Archies, or the Future Bible Heroes - is the lyrics are always the primary focus. No matter how great or attractive or attention getting the instrumentation is, the lyrics are always front and center. Here, with his backing tracks of abstract bubbles of noise and fuzzy warbles, it pushes his somewhat underwhelming sing-talking vocals ever forward as the listeners' ear clutches onto the sounds that aren't so foreign. Merritt's lyrics are surreal, beautiful, imaginative, humourous, and most often brilliant. From his earliest outings and still today he's an unparalleled lyricist, although his song-smithing has moved from innovative to heavily influenced. His earliest works, where his sequencers took care of most of the work, though spare compared to his rich instrumentals today, only bear a feint scar of influence from the Pet Shop Boys and Depeche mode, unlike, say, this year's Distortion which is an unapologetic tribute to Jesus and Mary Chain. A song like "The Trouble I've Been Looking For" is a romantic punch to the gut that tells a story, has emotional resonance, and is accompanied by some whining drones that dare you to accept them, it's one of Merritt's most challenging and rewarding songs and is surrounded by six songs on either side that equally dare you to catch on or flee in revulsion. Does it sound dated? Yes, but only because I repeatedly listened to it while I was still a teenager, but were I to encounter it today for the first time, there'd be nothing else like it.
Rating (keep/sell/undecided): keep

Continue reading "[Re-Review] Magnetic Fields/Wolf Parade/Balanescu Quartet" »


|


August 13, 2008

[Review] Pineapple Express

Viewed: In theatre
Release Date: August 6, 2008
writers: Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg
director: David Gordon Green

pineapple-express-2.jpg
Take Cheech and Chong's perpetual state of haziness, the odd-couple and on-the-run 80's clichés, and the Kevin Smith hetero-life-mate "bromantic" comedy, stuff them all in a bong and light that puppy up. Inhale deeply, hold, and you will find there's a name for that sensation... Pineapple Express.

The new comedy from the writing team of Superbad, producer Judd Apatow, and the director of art-house fair like George Washington and Undertow is certainly a bizarre amalgam of different sources, yet there's something natural about it all, like it should have been done long before now.

It's interesting the clash of not just cinematic genres, but filmmakers as well. Apatow, Rogen and company are known for their oft-low brow yet deeply insightful looks at the neurotic male mind, pushed in varying degrees, obviously, for comedic intent (like Woody Allen if he weren't so obsessed with the literati and upper class). Gordon Green is known for small-but-intense personal dramas. That a big, goofy action-comedy/drug culture movie would come out of the collaboration of the two was a bit of a surprise, when you'd figure it would turn out more like the Adam Sandler/Paul Thomas Anderson collision Punch Drunk Love (aka the Sandler movie for people who would never see a Sandler movie... and they wonder why it failed).

Continue reading "[Review] Pineapple Express" »


|


August 12, 2008

Hey, aren't there supposed to be, you know, sports in the Olympics

TV you make me angry.

My wife is a huge Olympics nut, and I admit they are enticing and exciting viewing, filling this humble country with a minor dosage of patriotic fervor, only to be doused by underwhelming performances. We care, but really, not all that much. We don't mind placing 6th, if at all, and we're ecstatic over bronze... "we made the podium", but in the context of our country and our pride, we know we're good at hockey, and if we're decent at anything else that's just gravy. Even having some American gold medalist is half-Canadian because his mother was born in the Maritimes is a coup for us. We take what we can get. But I'm not angry about our placings. We're a Winter Olympics country. In the Summer Games we're good at rowing and, every so often, swimming and that's about it. Doesn't matter all that much. Americans can win all the Gold medals they want, we have universal health care (and not George Bush). Chinese can win half of everything, that's all right, we have a free press.

What makes me angry, though, is the coverage, the hideous, atrocious coverage. Without having a digital cable or satellite package, we get three (sometimes four) channels of Olympics coverage in CBC, CBC Quebec, NBC and TSN. TSN is an affiliated partner of CBC so they're getting second string coverage, usually long-form events like softball, basketball or soccer (football), and you're more likely to see a NASCAR race as you'll see Olympics coverage. I'm not sure what the deal was between CBC and TSN but it's very limiting from a viewer perspective. NBC, meanwhile, is covering the games as a series of human interest stories and not actual sporting competition. Everything has to be drama, drama, drama. NBC, when they're not airing commercials, are airing some 3-5 minute long puff piece about some French swimmer's scandal, or the Dream Team of yore, or Mark Spitz's 7-medal record (again and again and again), not to mention the constant recapping of past glories from not just previous Olympics but two days ago. They spend more time documenting a gold medal win after the fact than actually covering the win at the time.

Alternating between CBC and CBC-Quebec is the preferable way to watch the sports, but they're equally infuriating because they air so many commercials. I'd say 40% of broadcast time is commercials. The CBC is doing this thing where they will focus on one particular discipline (swimming or gymnastics) and filling their time covering that sport. They're making very little effort to cover the other sports going on at that time or earlier in the day. WIth 10 - 20 minutes between swim races, you'd think they could cut to some other event, but no, we get about 8 minutes of commercials and 11 minutes of analysis of what we just saw or what's coming up and maybe a minute of updates from the studio. It's pathetic.

CBC is pushing their on-line broadband coverage, however their connections are overloaded and therefore sketchy and watching in a tiny window on the computer delivers none of the comforts of the living room, nor the social atmosphere of collecting together to watch the games.

I'm quite fed up with how the coverage of the Games has been progressing. I imagine outside of prime time (while at work or sleeping) coverage is a lot more focussed and fulfilling but, well, I'm a 9 to 5er now and don't have the luxury of watching til the wee hours of the morn or during the day.

Go Canada? Enh, whatever. I almost can't be bothered.
|


August 10, 2008

BOOM!

About 5 minutes to 4 am this morning a loud "thundercrack" shook the house and woke both Aden and I up. Usually when thunderclaps strike I get right back to sleep, but this... this was different. Car alarms went off (yeah, that happens too) but the sound of a plane landing also was echoing through the once still night sky. As the distinctive WEEEEE noise seemed to broach closer and closer, short little booms, tiny explosions, started vibrating the air. Aden and I both propped ourselves up, looking over the headboard out the window. "What is that?" she said. "Definitely not thunder," I remarked. Seconds later the sky lit up orange, and over the cut out of rooftops and trees sparks shot up violently into the sky, everywhere, and a massive, never-heard-before explosion followed by a huge plumb of smoke followed.

We lept to our feet and robes, pulses pounding, and escaped out the front door to see if there was...anything... just smoke, and a continued parade of booming.

CFB Borden ordnance storage? The Airport/plane crash? The airplane factory (is there an airplane factory? (4:25 news reports suspects a Shell gas station/hotel is on fire and that there's a "military response")

The brother-in-law emerged from downstairs and to the television (useless, 20 minutes later and nothing), radio (680 news getting calls from people but nothing conclusive), and internet (yeah right). Neighbours that got into their cars shortly after 4:00 have just returned.

As B. said, top ten scariest moments of my life... and still no answers. The booming has yet to subside completely, though it's waning (about 4:19 and another large crack).

Traffic camera shots: 4:15am
loc17.jpgloc18.jpgloc19.jpg

4:29 - another big, reverberating explosion.
The little guy continues to sleep through it all (probably for the better, no need to upset him)

4:30 - CityPulse 24 finally acknowledges the explosion, stating: "homes evacuated and road closed after explosion at Keele/Finch"
- more explosions, more erratic timing, but continuing

4:32 - More explosions, loud and picking up more often again... word is it's Shell's big oil depots at Finch/Keele (still going 5 minutes later, but again, not as strong)

loc18-1.jpg

4:45 - more sirens join the orchestra of booms, but still no TV news, and police are saying nothing to the radio news

4:50 - now saying it's Wilson/Keele where explosions are (which would be more in line of where we saw explosion (news scroll saying 2 people hurt, homes evacuated, OPP, Fire Crews, paramedics on scene, telling people to avoid area)

4:55 - Fire is dying down. Propane depot residents report.

5:10 - It's funny how in this day and age (that makes me sound old saying that) there's so little real news when something big like this happens. A few blips on CP24's news scroll, and 680 News is only keeping us up-to-date thanks to the traffic lady telling us about the various road closures and evacuations... so... going back to bed.

10:00 - managed to fall asleep around 6am, my racing mind finally settling down, although one more loud boom occurred about 5:30.

finally.. news
the Star
the Globe
Rannie has some crisp photos and video from his apartment

The north city is in chaos. The 401 is closed - no access to the 401 from the 400 or DVP) - and Sheppard and Wilson roads are both closed between Jane and Bathurst (Sheppard is the major street just north of us, which also cuts us off). Subways are turning around at Laurence West (blocking off TTC access to Yorkdale, Wilson and Downsview). If we actually needed to go anywhere today, we'd have to walk over to Bathurst to take a bus East or South. Crazy (it's probably a good thing we're not hosting the Olympics this year).


It's confirmed that it's a propane (nitrogen and helium) depot, and authorities are concerned that there are still tankers that may still explode. They've evacuated, and continue to evacuate thousands from the area (to Yorkdale mall, of all places). No fatalities reported but workers were inside when the accident first started.

"forget the cameras and go"

Is that lightning at 5:23?

401 Abandoned

No traffic on the 401 between 400 and DVP.. I've never seen this before.

loc13.jpgloc18-2.jpgloc19-2.jpgloc50.jpg

Backed up at Weston

Not sure where they're going to go

loc25.jpg

Briefing Update 11:15

Tanker trucks are still on fire but expected to be under control and possibly empty.
Spot fires throughout the scene, with propane tanks still threatening.
Natural Gas and hydro shut off in the immediate area.
The general scene is "better than it was"
A truck driver was filling up his truck, saw some smoke and left the area to report it and was away when the first explosion happened.


|


August 8, 2008

An honest to gosh BNY post about BNY

I had hope that "Buy Nothing Year" would be my grand "stupid boy project" that would fill my world (and blog) with insight about our consumerist culture and how much (or little) it all means, about how our lives differ today because of our access to technology, about how we view money, how we spend money and how our lives are influenced by forces outside of ourselves (marketers, credit card companies, advertisers, lobbyists etc). I was hoping I would cover the dreams and nightmares, the triumphs and regrets that would occur by abandoning that which I enjoy, to the extent that I part with aspects of my past and move on with the future.

8 months later and none of it has really, truly happened. I haven't spent my money like I used to, but I still consume. It's actually quite easy to do so on not much money, and it's easy to justify it. Had I not already had an out, had I not conceded still attending the cinema with my wife, I might have actually had a shot at something interesting. I mean, can you imagine the lamentations if I missed out on The Dark Knight and Iron Man and Hellboy and Wall-E and other such movies which I desperately would have wanted to see? There would have been about two dozen posts about The Dark Knight alone, the cinematic event of the decade, and how I felt like I was missing out and how the urges to break my stupid pledge were threatening to consume me and the project.

Alas, all you get is a middling review which isn't nearly as insightful as some of the many conversations I've had about the film, it's themes and the silly people who didn't enjoy it (unclench a little).

As for comics, to have abandoned them this year would have been an even bigger coup than abandoning the cinema, but given my entrenched-ness in Rack Raids I just couldn't let it go. But in many ways, buying only one or two titles a week very much feels like I have. There's a strange separation that occurs when you distance yourself from the fanboys who buy half of a companies line. Whereas when you're buying so many books, you start to feel like you're missing out on something in the other titles you're not getting. When you're only buying one or two books, you begin to question why you're even buying them. With the exception of the stronger indie titles, if you're not a regular comics consumer, most of the weekly releases hold no excitement. Trade Paperbacks, or complete story collections, are much more enticing, but even then, only for a limited time. Call it "now available - gotta have it" syndrome (NAGHI).

NAGHI is a pocketbook crippler which I've experienced many times in my life. It's that urge to go out to see the new movies in the first week of release because the trailers excited you. It's that drive to go out on Tuesday and pick up the new album (that you haven't heard) from that band you kind of like. It's that desire to purchase the just-released DVD of that movie you saw in the theatres that you don't remember the story, but you do remember being entertained. It's that need to pick up the latest trade paperback written by so-and-so because you liked their last one. NAGHI strikes, your will is crippled, your bank account depletes.

Wait

Just wait

Give it a month or two or three... or six. Then pick that book up off the shelf, or the cd off the rack and tell me you still want it as badly as you did when it first came out. Arguably you're still interested, but are you as interested as you were? No. You know why? Because it's not new anymore, it's not fresh. Others have seen it and digested it long before you did, they've told you about it and the radioman said it was kinda allright, he guesses, and the mystique of the unknown has faded into the dull tarnish of the vaguely familiar. You also have let slip another dozen and one cds/books/movies past by, and there's always something new. When you've fallen behind, it's hard to catch up, and sometimes it's easier to just give up and not catch up at all and be like "regular" people who don't obsess about such things.

But "regular" people are dull, boring, cultureless beings who are more enthused by whatever that story your neighbour tells about mistakenly buying whole wheat buns instead of white bread rather than enjoying 6 hours of straight Venture Brothers DVD action. Is that what you want to become, someone who listens to plumbing stories or someone who sits in anticipation their latest Amazon.co.uk order containing what's supposed to be the latest in ingenious funny business out of England? Who needs neighbours?

I think there's a fear in the pop-culture obsessive of missing out, but also a fear of participating in life outside of fantasy. Television and iPods are awesome, but so is your wife whipping a shuttlecock at your face (we're playing badminton you perv, get your mind out of the gutter) or having a chat with a stranger in line at the supermarket while you wait. Actual interaction, with real people, who aren't cliche spouting figments of someone else's imagination...

Did have a point here somewhere...

The point is, I've learned the lesson of BNY even if it hasn't exactly manifested itself in an entertaining or secondary-usefulness manner. 1) There's only so much one person can hope to consume in their lifetime. 2) Real people are, about half the time, more interesting than fiction. 3) Money can be used for other things than keeping you stocked to the gills in paraphernalia. 4) Spending more than you make is a bad idea in the short term, and detrimental in the long term. 5) Spending all of what you make is foolish. 6) I'm not a terribly adventurous person, and I'm okay with that. 7) what you want isn't necessarily what you need. 8) what you get isn't necessarily what you wanted. 9) very little in this life is returnable (aka. nothing is ever a sure thing). 10) I regret nothing.

Seriously, I'm glad I got to see the Dark Knight and didn't have to wait and sift through reviews and sit and listen to people talk about it and not be able to contribute and opinion. I would die inside a little. I could have done without seeing Get Smart, enjoyable as it was, but there are some experiences I would have regretted missing out on.

I still have moment, especially now that I'm debt-free, where I want to just splurge, where I want to toss my credit card in the wind and buy the hell out of an HMV, just pick up material goods because, goddammit I miss them. I want a new cd. I want to buy a DVD (when I see a bin of $4 DVDs at the superstore containing the 3-disc special edition of Panic Room or A Mighty Wind I get weak-kneed, not because either are particularly great movies (though I did enjoy them and/or their cast and/or their director) but because my completest tendencies start to come over me. Same thing happens if I buy a comic book to review and it references a previous story, I want that previous story. It's not that I'm terribly interested, else I would have read it already, but again, my completest nature. Also, I can't resist a bargain. Also, I sometimes just get spending urges, like last week when I wound up in a used book store and bought $35 in used comics and books for my wife and stepson (or at least using them as an excuse to do so).

It's a scary thing when that happens. I'll stand in a store and I'll be looking for one thing, find another, like say I was searching for Teen TItans Season 5 for the little guy on DVD, didn't find it, but found that they had Flight of the Conchord's CD on the 2/$25 rack. I look around for a second /$25 and spy Darjeeling Limited on the 2/$30, and suddenly I'm on the hunt for $55 worth of goods. In my hunt I realize there's a new Portishead album out, I find an Amon Tobin cd I missed, I pick up Batman Animated season 2 (gap in the collection) for $19.99 and settle for a copy of Metric's first album as my second $2/25 and the Omega Man as my second $2/30. I begin to look at it and say, "Well, I'm buying this much, might as well get those two Angel box sets that are only $20 each, and Season 7 of Buffy, which I still haven't watched." $235 and way out of budget later, I stride home, my goods in my backpack, and say "what the hell" and stop into Pages and buy $60 worth of books which, chances are, I won't actually read. In fact, that copy of Omega Man, still wrapped up six months later, and only two episodes of Angel actually watched.

It's a made up set of purchases, but an embarrassingly true scenario which I really don't want to continue repeating.

Buy nothing year is actually teaching me introspection and discipline at the purchasing counter, but it's eliminating the moments of weakness where I slip up that's crucial.

I do really wish that I could buy this, now, though. It would make me ever so happy. But I'm being good. I'll still want it though.

One of the things I'm still having a terrible time curving the craving for is action figures. I lust after action figures only marginally less than I lust after my wife, and that's not healthy. I see all the various DC Universe action figures that Mattel is producing and I drool like a Prozac-addled invalid. My wife bought me two of my action figure desires for my birthday (the Kirby-inspired Darkseid and Mr. Miracle) and I took them out of their package and put them on the shelf where occasionally they fall over. That's it. They look fantastic, but they only thrill me when I don't have them and for the few moments after getting them. Once they're out of the package, the thrill goes away almost immediately. I wonder what acronym I can give that. "OOPTIG"? (Out of package, thrill is gone).

I dunno. That's why I'm trying to commit myself to only getting action figures that will a) be taken out of the package and b) played with by my stepson...

which involves the whole DC Universe Infinite Heroes line... heh heh heh (hands wringing).

-fin-
|


August 7, 2008

[Re-Review] Sexy Beast, Office Space, Intolerable Cruelty

Source (purchased/given/borrowed/the wife's): borrowed/purchased/the wife's
Dates Acquired: 2006/2000/2007
Original Review(s): Intolerable Cruelty
( because it amuses me, here is GAK's review of Sexy Beast, sent to me via emai, June 14, 2001)
SEXY BEAST is well worth a garner when you have an opp. ben kingsley in showy cockney mode in the south of france and boulders and car doors and shotguns that don't fire and steam baths and NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO FUCKING WAY! NO FUCKING WAY! NOFUCKING WAY! NO FUCKINGWAY! and rabbit demons and cracked pool tiles.

tn2_sexy_beast_1.jpg
Re-Review: Sexy Beast d. Jonathan Glazer, w.Lous Mellis & David Scinto
From the Summer of 2000 through the Summer of 2001, my buddy Ryan and I would gather with a big bag of Real Fruit gummies and some soda on Fridays to watch a variety of programming which included South Park and Sex and the City. Between the two, however, would be Muchmusic's The Wedge, an hour long program at the time hosted by Sook-Yin Lee and featured the only dose of indie music videos around. There I discovered Badly Drawn Boy, The Beta Band and others, and in one particularly delightful episode, Jonathan Glazer. Glazer's not a musician, but a video director, having done most notably some of my favourite Massive Attack and Radiohead videos. This particular interview spotlighted his good nature and his new film, Sexy Beast, showing the opening sequence, complete with nigh-impregnable cockney accents, a thudding Stranglers tune and revolving camera giving the POV of a giant rolling boulder. I knew I had to see this film (at the turn of the century, British mobster movies were the it thing). Like Spike Jonze and Michel Gondry before him, I knew that there would be something different about this movie, something stylish and avant garde that would separate it from the masses.... it had hipster cache, before hipsters were hip. These days, Sexy Beast is remembered (rightly) for Ben Kingsly's stereotype-busting performance (which unfortunately he's now been coasting off of for about 7 years) as mad-dog Don, a bat-shit crazy mobster who inspires trembling fear in everyone who knows him. While on screen we only get a little taste of what makes him so fearful, it's the trembling of Ray Winstone's Gary "Gal" Dove trying to turn down a job Don's proposing - thus taking him away from his comfortable life in a Spanish villa with his wife - that truly spells intimidation. Though Gal isn't necessarily a tough guy to have Don practically wet him down to a timid, shivering chihuahua is testament to Don's effect on people. Kingsly carries himself in an awkward, unreal manner, stiff in posture, featureless in his face, acting almost entirely with his eyes and body... it's like watching a rubberband stretch and stretch, just waiting to snap, then protecting your eyes when it does. Pulp Fiction ushered in the sountrack as film score and some directors, like Glazer know how to get the maximum effect out of the songs they choose (obscurity only help). It's a methodical, intense drama with incredible moments of suspense. Glazer has only done one film since (the Kubrick-ian Birth), but his talents are without question in this his first endeavour. Although not necessarily a masterpiece, Sexy Beast remains a tight little (89 minutes) film, full of great performances, vivid camera work, and conceptually intriguing elements throughout.
(PS - The AV Club also revisited Sexy Beast recently)

Continue reading "[Re-Review] Sexy Beast, Office Space, Intolerable Cruelty" »


|


August 2, 2008

[Review] X-Files: I Want To Believe

Viewed: In theatre
Release Date: July 26, 2008
writers: Chris Carter and Frank Spotniz
director: Chris Carter

x_files_main.jpg
(I've already discussed my history with the X-Files in a previous post, so this is going to be less a personal history lesson an more about the movie)

To my, and I think many a recovered X-phile's surprise, this film is far from what we were expecting, and pleasantly so. Nearly a decade has passed since the end of the series and even longer since many watched the once glorious program diminish in its competence and relevance with each episode. The hope was that this movie would be what the creative team promised it to be: more of the monster-of-the-week style of storytelling rather than tackling the messy, go-nowhere serialized conspiracy story. In many minds, I'm sure, there was a thought that this could revitalize the franchise into an ongoing series of one-off movies. Instead, what Chris Carter and friends delivered was a stand-alone, character-driven mystery with only hints of paranormal elements, and ultimately the perfect send-off for Mulder and Scully and their adventures together.

If you've never watched the X-Files before, it doesn't matter. This film, with the exception of a few nods in the fans' direction, introduces Fox Mulder and Dana Scully independently of their many exploits from years passed. With fresh eyes you would see these characters for who they are now. Scully, a former FBI agent now devoted, caring doctor/surgeon at a Catholic hospital, dealing currently with a particularly tough case of a young boy, dying, with little hope for her to give him. Mulder is her former partner at the FBI, now her life partner, squalled away in their remote home, keeping tabs on paranormal happenings around the globe on-line, lining his den with newspaper clippings. Mulder is hiding out from the FBI, wanted for some reason barely explained (or important), but obviously left alone. Scully is approached at the hospital by the Bureau, requesting Mulder's help in a missing persons case, a case where their only lead has come from Father Joseph Crissman, a convicted pedophile living in a self policing community for sex offenders. Scully urges Mulder to assist, despite his protests, and later comes to regret metaphorically awakening the beast. Crissman has had visions which have led the FBI to limited results, and now, with time running out on their missing person, they want Mulder's help in interpreting Crissman's dubious abilities. And Mulder wants nothing more than to believe, and to be believed.

Continue reading "[Review] X-Files: I Want To Believe" »


|